Find out which AI governance documents you are missing
Your biggest customer will eventually ask how you govern AI. Most small companies discover at that moment that they have nothing written down. This tells you what is missing before someone else does.
- ✓Nine questions, about three minutes, no jargon
- ✓Your result appears on screen immediately, with no email needed to see it
- ✓Measured against ISO/IEC 42001, the international standard for AI management
- ✓Tells you which three things to fix first, and why that order
Why this exists
Software that manages AI governance is built for large enterprises and priced for them, commonly $7,500 to $50,000 a year. For a company running a handful of AI tools, that is more than the problem is worth. So most small companies buy nothing, write nothing, and hope the question never comes.
Then a customer sends a security questionnaire with an AI section, or an insurer asks, and there is nothing to send back.
What you get
A readiness score, and then the eleven documents an AI management system is expected to hold, each marked as in place, partly there, missing, or genuinely not needed yet at your stage. Each one is explained in plain language, with the reason it matters to you specifically based on what you answered.
If you already hold ISO 27001, ISO 9001 or SOC 2, the report tells you which of these documents extend what you already maintain rather than starting from nothing. That usually cuts the apparent workload by more than half.
What this is not. It is a self-assessment against a published checklist, not an audit, not a certification, and not legal advice. It reports what the standard asks organisations to hold. Whether a particular obligation applies to you depends on your jurisdiction, sector and circumstances.
Guides
Written to answer the question properly, so you can act on them without taking the check at all.